Phil = or < Tiger?

mulligan, 10 April 2006, Comments Off on Phil = or < Tiger?
Categories: Uncategorized

OK, there’s been much banter on the sports shows today about how Phil Mickelson is playing as the best player today, even better than Tiger, at least for the moment. But I don’t think anyone is really suggesting that Phil is better than Tiger Woods, all round.

The real question, I think, is whether Mickelson has proven himself to be a worthy adversary or rival to Tiger — the adversary we’ve all been waiting for. Is Mickelson better than Retief, Vijay, and Ernie, in terms of competing with Tiger? I think he clearly is, but what do others thinks?

Next question: why is Tiger’s collar so messed up?


You must be logged in to post a comment.

Leave a Reply:

Name *

Mail (hidden) *


Email: thegolfblog [@]

Advertise Here